Permission to Appeal - January 2024

The Supreme Court has received x PTAs in January 2024, out of which y has been Granted and z has been refused.

Case NameJusticesPTAReasons given
UKSC 2023/0142
Stevens (Respondent) v Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd (In Liquidation) and another (Appellants)
Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1120		Lord Reed
Lord Hamblen
Lord Burrows		Granted
31 January 2024		 
UKSC 2023/0062
Rukhadze and others (Appellants) v Recovery Partners GP Ltd and another (Respondents)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 305		Lord ReedLord HamblenLord BurrowsPermission for this cross appeal is refused.
31 January 2024		This cross-appeal does not raise an arguable question of law.
UKSC 2023/0068Glasgow City Council (Respondent) v X (Appellant) (AP) (Scotland)Neutral citation: [2023] CSIH 7Lord HodgeLord SalesLady SimlerPTA Granted31 January 2024 
UKSC 2023/0143R (on the application of The National Council for Civil Liberties ('Liberty')) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another (Respondents)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 926Lord HodgeLord SalesLady SimlerPTA Refused31 January 2024PTA Refused because there is no arguable point of law.
UKSC 2023/0147Darty Holdings SAS (Respondent) v Carton-Kelly (as additional liquidator of CGL Realisations Ltd) (Appellant)[2023] EWCA Civ 1135Lord HodgeLord SalesLady SimlerPTA Refused31 January 2024Permission to appeal is refused because the appeal does not raise a point of law which is arguable or of general public importance.
UKSC 2023/0140Celik (AP) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 921Lord Lloyd-JonesLord LeggattLady RosePTA Refused24 January 2024Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
UKSC 2023/0141Volterra Fietta (Appellant) v Diag Human SE and another (Respondents)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1107Lord Lloyd-JonesLord LeggattLady RosePTA Refused24 January 2024Permission to appeal is refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
UKSC 2023/0144Olsten (UK) Holdings Ltd (Respondent) v Adecco Group European Works Council (Appellant)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 883Lord Lloyd-JonesLord LeggattLady RosePTA Refused24 January 2024PTA Refused because there is no arguable point of law.
UKSC 2023/0146Mints and others (Appellants) v PJSC National Bank Trust and another (Respondents)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1132Lord Lloyd-JonesLord LeggattLady RosePTA Granted24 January 2024 
UKSC 2023/0148Khan (Appellant) v Singh (as trustee in bankruptcy of Mohammed Razi Khan) and another (Respondents)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1119Lord BriggsLord StephensLord RichardsPTA Refused1 February 2024PTA is refused because there is no arguable point of law on Ground 2 which if corrected could have led to a different outcome, otherwise no arguable point of law.
UKSC 2023/0149In the matter of SA (by her Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor) (Declaration of Non-Recognition of Marriage) (AP)Neutral citation: [2023] EWCA Civ 1003Lord BriggsLord StephensLord RichardsPTA Refused1 February 2024PTA is Refused because there is no arguable point of law.

Back to top